• Research indicates slow-growing broilers exhibit more positive behaviors (walking, preening) compared to conventionally grown broilers.
• Stocking density showed minimal impact on broiler behavior in the study.
• Further research is needed to understand the effects of growth rate across various broiler genotypes for better animal welfare.

A study conducted by researchers at the University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture investigated the effects of different broiler growing methods on chicken behavior. The study compared conventional and slow-growth methods, examining genetic strain, stocking density, and age to understand their impact on broiler welfare. The findings suggest that slow-growing broilers displayed more natural behaviors, raising questions about ethical considerations in poultry production.

• What: A study comparing conventional and slow-grow broiler methods, focusing on their impact on chicken behavior and welfare.
• Who: Shawna Weimer, Rosie Whittle, University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture, Center for Food Animal Wellbeing, Dale Bumpers College of Agricultural, Food and Life Sciences.
• When: Study published in Poultry Science. Butterball announced plant closure in December. Cargill announced plant closure in January.
• Where: Research conducted at the University of Arkansas. Poultry sector analysis focuses on the U.S. and Arkansas.

The study's findings suggest that slow-growing broiler methods may lead to improved animal welfare due to more natural behaviors exhibited by the chickens. However, the economic implications for producers, such as longer growth times and increased feed consumption, need to be considered. The research highlights the complex interplay between ethical concerns, production costs, and consumer demand in the poultry industry. Further research is crucial to understanding the various factors influencing broiler behavior and developing best practices for poultry production.

The economic impact to the broiler industry raises the question: ‘Why would you want to use a broiler that is going to eat more food, grow slower, and cost more to produce?’

The University of Arkansas study provides valuable insights into the impact of different broiler growing methods on chicken behavior and welfare. While slow-growth methods appear to offer potential benefits for animal welfare, the economic implications for producers remain a key consideration. Further research is needed to explore the complexities of broiler behavior across different genotypes and to develop sustainable and ethical practices for the poultry industry. The study underscores the ongoing efforts to balance economic viability with ethical considerations in poultry production.